ONE VIEW / MANY KINDS OF EVIDENCE

The full picture first.

Every line keeps its own raw units, but the graph normalizes each series inside the selected window so their movement can be compared by shape.

Select up to six signals.
Checking measurement coverage...
NORMALIZED MOVEMENT / 0–100 WITHIN WINDOW

Cross-signal movement

LOADING
SHIB cross-signal comparison chart Selected SHIB signals normalized to a common visual scale for exploratory comparison.

A line at 100 means “high relative to this signal’s own values in this window,” not that two measurements share units or magnitude. Missing measurements stay missing. A recorded zero means zero in the measured sample, not necessarily zero activity across the network. Signal buttons show exactly how many days contain data; isolated days appear as dots, not invented full-month trends.

Why a selected signal has no line, only dots, or a flat line

BENEATH THE OVERLAY / RAW MEASUREMENTS

What the lines actually mean.

Keep the normalized picture and the underlying evidence together.

SHIBOOM / QUESTIONS, NOT CLAIMS

Things worth chasing next.

Development vs price

Do high-activity ShibaOne periods tend to lead, lag or completely ignore SHIB price movement?

Burns vs attention

When burn activity jumps, does the market react — or only the conversation?

Network vs market

Does sampled network vitality change before volume, after it, or independently?

Disagreement

The most interesting moment may be when several signals move and one refuses to follow.

Method note: this page is deliberately exploratory. Pearson correlation is calculated only from dates where both signals actually have measurements; missing days are never converted to zero. It is descriptive, not proof of causation, prediction, or a trading edge. Network measurements may be sampled or extrapolated. Tracked-wallet burn transfers are verified on-chain over explicitly recorded scan hours; unscanned hours are missing, not zero.